The examples below summarize allegations from public Georgia medical-malpractice complaints involving Emory Healthcare or Emory-linked care settings. They are included to show the kinds of facilities, conditions, and alleged care failures that appear in filed complaints. Allegations are not findings of liability, and each summary should be read in that limited posture.
Georgia medical malpractice allegations
Georgia Medical Malpractice Allegations Involving Emory Healthcare
Public complaint examples involving Emory Healthcare, Emory facilities, or related Emory care settings can help readers see recurring allegation patterns without treating any allegation as proven.
Overview
Related Georgia malpractice topics
Related allegation types
Emergency-room discharge / failure to admit 3 case summaries Radiology / imaging follow-up 3 case summaries Surgical complication delay 3 case summaries Airway / respiratory failure 2 case summaries Delayed stroke diagnosis 2 case summaries Pediatric emergency / discharge 2 case summaries Pressure ulcers / wound care 2 case summaries Sepsis / infection delay 2 case summaries Birth injury / OB emergency delay 1 case summary Bowel obstruction / abdominal emergency 1 case summary Informed consent / wrong procedure 1 case summary Medication error / overdose 1 case summary Orthopedic / spine surgical complication 1 case summary Post-operative bleeding / hematoma 1 case summary
Related Georgia opinions
Related Georgia Opinions
Court of Appeals: § 9-11-9.1 affidavits turn on relevant experience, not specialty labels. The Court of Appeals reversed dismissal where the trial court demanded orthopedic post-operative experience from a § 9-11-9.1 expert. At the pleading stage, the question is whether the expert's experience is relevant to the alleged omission, not whether the expert shares the defendant's specialty. Georgia Court of Appeals reverses summary judgment in Dilantin extravasation malpractice case. The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed summary judgment for Emory Healthcare, holding that conflicting testimony about which IV site was used and expert testimony based on differential diagnosis created jury questions in a Dilantin extravasation case. Georgia Court of Appeals affirms summary judgment over deficient expert affidavits in IV infiltration case. The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed summary judgment for Emory Healthcare, holding that the plaintiffs' expert-nurse affidavits failed to attach referenced medical records and did not establish qualifications to opine on causation from delayed detection of a neonatal IV infiltration. Georgia Court Remands Medical Malpractice Case for Tolling Analysis After COVID-19 Emergency Order The Court of Appeals vacated summary judgment in a malpractice renewal action, holding that the renewal statute does not defeat the five-year statute of repose but that the trial court must consider COVID-19 judicial-emergency tolling under Golden.