Emory Midtown complaint alleges unnecessary sternotomy after equivocal aortic-dissection imaging
The complaint alleges that a patient presented to Emory University Hospital Midtown with chest pain and elevated troponin levels, underwent cardiac catheterization, and then had imaging that the complaint characterizes as equivocal or poor quality for suspected aortic dissection. According to the complaint, surgical staff proceeded with a high-risk median sternotomy and aortic inspection despite a negative transesophageal echocardiogram. The complaint alleges that the surgery revealed no aortic dissection and that the patient was later diagnosed with and treated for myocarditis.
Overview
This page concerns a public complaint alleging that providers at Emory University Hospital Midtown performed a median sternotomy to evaluate suspected aortic dissection despite inconclusive imaging and a later myocarditis diagnosis.
Chronology
- According to the complaint, the patient presented to the emergency department on May 10, 2023 with chest pain and significantly elevated troponin levels.
- According to the complaint, cardiac catheterization showed no clear cardiac source for the enzyme elevation.
- The complaint alleges that a transthoracic echocardiogram and CT angiogram were performed and that the CT scan was of poor quality because of motion artifact.
- The complaint alleges that surgical staff proceeded with median sternotomy and aortic inspection despite what the complaint describes as a negative transesophageal echocardiogram.
- According to the complaint, intraoperative inspection revealed no aortic dissection.
- The complaint states that the patient was later diagnosed with myocarditis and treated with medication.
Alleged failures
- The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the standard of care by proceeding with a high-risk sternotomy based on an equivocal CTA and negative TEE.
- The complaint alleges that additional noninvasive imaging should have been performed to define or rule out aortic dissection before surgery.
- The complaint alleges that the surgical intervention was unnecessary because the patient later was diagnosed with myocarditis.
- The complaint alleges physical and mental anguish and medical expenses related to the alleged negligence.
Entities and tags
Questions this example answers
What does the Emory Midtown aortic-dissection sternotomy allege?
The complaint alleges that a patient presented to Emory University Hospital Midtown with chest pain and elevated troponin levels, underwent cardiac catheterization, and then had imaging that the complaint characterizes as equivocal or poor quality for suspected aortic dissection. According to the complaint, surgical staff proceeded with a high-risk median sternotomy and aortic inspection despite a negative transesophageal echocardiogram. The complaint alleges that the surgery revealed no aortic dissection and that the patient was later diagnosed with and treated for myocarditis.
Who is identified in this public case example?
This public case example identifies Emory University Hospital Midtown, Alison Folger Ward, M.D., Dale Shelton Deas, M.D., and Woodrow Jackson Farrington II, M.D. It also tags the source-supported entities Emory University Hospital Midtown, Alison Folger Ward, M.D., Dale Shelton Deas, M.D., Woodrow Jackson Farrington II, M.D., and Aortic dissection.
What alleged failures are summarized here?
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the standard of care by proceeding with a high-risk sternotomy based on an equivocal CTA and negative TEE. The complaint alleges that additional noninvasive imaging should have been performed to define or rule out aortic dissection before surgery. The complaint alleges that the surgical intervention was unnecessary because the patient later was diagnosed with myocarditis.