My practice centers on serious medical negligence. It is the overwhelming majority of my active work, not one service on a long list. I also review a limited number of other serious matters when the problem fits my experience, the proof warrants close litigation work, and the case makes sense for a focused practice.
Some matters involve claim delay, denial, underpayment, pressure tactics, or other insurer conduct that may go beyond an ordinary coverage disagreement. These cases often turn on chronology, policy language, claim handling, and the documents that show what the insurer actually did.
I still handle some business and contract matters when the dispute is serious, the issues are substantial, and the case calls for careful written analysis and strategy.
Some cases do not fit neatly into a label but still present real stakes, demanding records, difficult proof questions, or a need for close strategic thinking from the outset. If the matter falls within my experience and looks like a strong fit for a practice centered on medical malpractice, I am willing to consider it.
The first question is whether the subject matter fits my experience and judgment.
I look at the facts, the likely proof, the stakes, the documents, and whether the theory of the case appears coherent and supportable. Some matters may be important to the client but still not be strong litigation cases.
A small, personally managed practice makes sense only if direct lawyer attention and independent analysis are likely to matter in the case. If not, I am unlikely to take it on.
Use the contact page to start a structured inquiry. The goal is a cleaner first exchange and a more useful initial review of whether the matter fits my practice.
