Daniel E. Holloway Medical malpractice, other select cases
Email me about your case.

Georgia malpractice type allegations

Georgia Emergency-Room Discharge and Failure-to-Admit Allegations

Emergency-room discharge and failure-to-admit allegations often focus on whether symptoms, abnormal findings, or worsening condition should have led to admission, transfer, specialist consultation, or further workup before the patient was sent home.

Related case summaries All Georgia medical malpractice topics
Overview

The examples below are limited to public Georgia complaint allegations involving discharge, attempted discharge, premature clearance, or failure to admit or transfer despite claimed warning signs. They are not findings that any emergency provider acted negligently; they show how public filings describe discharge and admission decisions in disputed medical-malpractice cases.

Related Georgia malpractice topics

Related healthcare providers

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta 3 case summaries Emory Healthcare 3 case summaries Piedmont 3 case summaries Grady 1 case summary
Related Georgia opinions

Related Georgia Opinions

Court of Appeals: "shall instruct" in the emergency-care statute did not strip a trial court of discretion over an issue left out of the pretrial order. The Court of Appeals vacated a defense verdict and remanded, holding that the trial court wrongly believed OCGA § 51-1-29.5's command that the court "shall instruct the jury" compelled it to let the jury apply the emergency-care gross-negligence standard — an issue no party had listed in the pretrial order. The trial court retained discretion whether to allow the late issue and must now exercise it. Georgia Court of Appeals affirms summary judgment in psychiatric discharge causation case The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for emergency physicians, holding that a psychiatric patient's accidental drowning three days after discharge was too remote in time, place, and mechanism to establish proximate cause. Georgia Court of Appeals affirms defense verdict and ER gross-negligence jury instructions. The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed a defense verdict in an emergency-room malpractice case, holding that OCGA 51-1-4's definition of gross negligence applies under the ER statute and that the jury instructions properly required proof of gross negligence in at least one alleged way. Supreme Court of Georgia: the medical malpractice damages cap cannot touch a verdict that also includes pain-and-suffering damages a jury was entitled to award. Reaffirming Nestlehutt under stare decisis, the Supreme Court held that OCGA § 51-13-1's $350,000 noneconomic damages cap cannot be applied at all to a verdict that includes constitutionally protected noneconomic damages — here, the estate's pre-death pain and suffering. Because the statute lumps every claimant's noneconomic damages into one capped sum and offers no way to carve a verdict apart, the Court vacated an order that had cut a $29,250,000 wrongful death award to $350,000. It expressly reserved whether the cap could reach a stand-alone wrongful death award.