Daniel E. Holloway Medical malpractice, other select cases
Email me about your case.

Georgia malpractice type allegations

Georgia Surgical Complication Delay Allegations

Surgical and procedural-complication complaints often ask whether a complication was recognized, investigated, communicated, and treated before avoidable injury occurred.

Related case summaries All Georgia medical malpractice topics
Overview

The examples below focus on public complaint allegations where delayed recognition or delayed treatment of a surgical or procedural complication is central. Generic surgery cases are excluded unless the alleged delay concerns a complication after the procedure.

Related Georgia malpractice topics

Related healthcare providers

Emory Healthcare 3 case summaries Piedmont 3 case summaries Wellstar 2 case summaries
Related Georgia opinions

Related Georgia Opinions

Georgia Court of Appeals affirms verdict in surgical-center understaffing malpractice case. The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed a $6.5 million medical-malpractice judgment and a $1.82 million attorney-fee award, holding that expert testimony on understaffing and ACLS response supported causation and that the trial court could consider a contingency-fee agreement when awarding OCGA 9-11-68 fees. Georgia Supreme Court denies certiorari in Keel, with concurrence on expert personal-practices jury charges. The Georgia Supreme Court denied certiorari in Ga. Bone & Joint Surgeons, P.C. v. Keel. Justice Bethel's concurrence explains that Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group does not require a personal-practices jury instruction and that pattern-instruction status alone cannot decide whether a requested charge should be given. Georgia Court of Appeals affirms defense verdict despite co-defendant settlement evidence The Court of Appeals affirmed a defense verdict for Eastside Medical Center, holding that any error in admitting a co-defendant doctor's settlement was harmless because the record and special verdict form showed no hospital liability. Georgia Court of Appeals affirms $15 million prostate-surgery malpractice verdict The Court of Appeals affirmed a $15 million verdict after a bladder-perforation death, rejecting challenges to pain-and-suffering instructions, preexisting-condition instructions, and the trial court's refusal to order remittitur. Supreme Court of Georgia: the medical malpractice damages cap cannot touch a verdict that also includes pain-and-suffering damages a jury was entitled to award. Reaffirming Nestlehutt under stare decisis, the Supreme Court held that OCGA § 51-13-1's $350,000 noneconomic damages cap cannot be applied at all to a verdict that includes constitutionally protected noneconomic damages — here, the estate's pre-death pain and suffering. Because the statute lumps every claimant's noneconomic damages into one capped sum and offers no way to carve a verdict apart, the Court vacated an order that had cut a $29,250,000 wrongful death award to $350,000. It expressly reserved whether the cap could reach a stand-alone wrongful death award.